On-demand Webinar: Third-Party Risk in the Agentic Era
Watch Now
On-demand Webinar: Third-Party Risk in the Agentic Era
Watch Now
On-demand Webinar: Third-Party Risk in the Agentic Era
Watch Now
Build a risk program your stakeholders trust.
Zania's AI agents identify, assess, and treat risks across your portfolio, while your team stays in control with the evidence to back every decision.
$11.4M
Total ALE:
Risk Portfolio
Acme Corp
47
Total risks
+3 this week
8
Critical
4 threatening
94%
Coverage
+6% QoQ
-26%
ALE Reduction
vs. last quarter
Exposure by Domain
Data Security
$4.2M
Identity & Access
100%
Third-Party
85%
Infrastructure
85%
ALE Trend
26%
Top Risks by ALE
Data Breach via Insider
$4.2M
Critical
Ransomware Attack
$1.8M
High
Third-Party Exposure
$920K
High
12 risks treated this quarter · 4 treatments active
47 risks quanitfied
Continuous monitoring active
$11.4M
Total ALE:
Risk Portfolio
Acme Corp
47
Total risks
+3 this week
8
Critical
4 threatening
94%
Coverage
+6% QoQ
-26%
ALE Reduction
vs. last quarter
Exposure by Domain
Data Security
$4.2M
Identity & Access
100%
Third-Party
85%
Infrastructure
85%
ALE Trend
26%
Top Risks by ALE
Data Breach via Insider
$4.2M
Critical
Ransomware Attack
$1.8M
High
Third-Party Exposure
$920K
High
12 risks treated this quarter · 4 treatments active
47 risks quanitfied
Continuous monitoring active
“Zania’s agents turned our risk assessments from a manual marathon into an automated sprint, slashing the effort to a fraction of what it was.”
Kenneth Moras
Head of Security at Plaid
How it Works
An agentic workflow for internal risk
Risk Lifecycle
Running
Discover
Assess
Treat
Report
Report with confidence
Simulate treatment options, prioritize the highest-leverage actions, and drive execution.
Mitigate
Deploy MFA org-wide
Transfer
Cyber insurance policy
Accept
Legacy system (EOL Q4)
Avoid
Deprecate shadow IT tool
68% exposure reduction possible
Risk Lifecycle
Running
Discover
Assess
Treat
Report
Report with confidence
Simulate treatment options, prioritize the highest-leverage actions, and drive execution.
Mitigate
Deploy MFA org-wide
Transfer
Cyber insurance policy
Accept
Legacy system (EOL Q4)
Avoid
Deprecate shadow IT tool
68% exposure reduction possible
Built by risk and compliance leaders from
Risk Identification
Uncover risks beyond static registers
Agents pull risks from across your environment, whether they originate in systems or risk registers. Bring fragmented signals into one place so teams can act with confidence.
Discover Risks
Describe a risk in plain English…
e.g, "What happens if a contractor exfiltrates customer data?"
or start from a template
Insider Threat
Claud Misconfiguration
Third-Party Breach
AI Surfaced
4 New
Unencrypted PII in staging DB
Critical
via AWS config
Stale admin credentials (90+ days)
High
via AWS config
Missing DLP on contractor endpoints
High
via CrowdStrike
S3 bucket publick read access
Medium
via AWS config
Discover Risks
Describe a risk in plain English…
e.g, "What happens if a contractor exfiltrates customer data?"
or start from a template
Insider Threat
Claud Misconfiguration
Third-Party Breach
AI Surfaced
4 New
Unencrypted PII in staging DB
Critical
via AWS config
Stale admin credentials (90+ days)
High
via AWS config
Missing DLP on contractor endpoints
High
via CrowdStrike
S3 bucket publick read access
Medium
via AWS config
Risk Analysis
4 Critical
SELECTED RISK
Data Breach via Insider Threat
Annual Loss Expectancy
$2.4M
Threat Event Frequency
12.4 / yr
Vulnerability
0.68
Loss Magnitude
$340K
Contact Frequency
18.2 / yr
TOP RISKS BY ALE
Data Breach via Insider Threat
Critical
$2.4M
Ransomware Attack
Critical
$1.8M
Third-Party Data Exposure
High
$920K
Cloud Misconfiguration
What-If Simulation
+MFA enforcement
ALE
34%
Risk Analysis
4 Critical
SELECTED RISK
Data Breach via Insider Threat
Annual Loss Expectancy
$2.4M
Threat Event Frequency
12.4 / yr
Vulnerability
0.68
Loss Magnitude
$340K
Contact Frequency
18.2 / yr
TOP RISKS BY ALE
Data Breach via Insider Threat
Critical
$2.4M
Ransomware Attack
Critical
$1.8M
Third-Party Data Exposure
High
$920K
Cloud Misconfiguration
What-If Simulation
+MFA enforcement
ALE
34%
Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ)
Assess risk with a methodology your team can stand behind
Zania combines evidence, business context, and external intelligence to generate quantified assessments with clear rationale (ALE, modified FAIR, Monte Carlo).
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Treatment & Remediation
Prioritize the actions most likely to reduce risk
Agents model treatment options, understand how changes affect assessed risk, and focus time and resources on the actions that matter most.
Treatment Decisions
Data Breach via Insider Threat
Mitigate
Transfer
Accept
Avoid
TOP REMEDIATIONS BY ALE REDUCTION
Implement endpoint DLP controls
In Progress
$820K
ALE reduction
Enforce MFA across all admin accounts
Approved
$640K
ALE reduction
Deploy SIEM correlation rules
Pending
$410K
ALE reduction
Restrict third-party API access scope
In Progress
$290K
ALE reduction
RISK-041 synced to Jira
SEC-2847 • Assigned
Treatment Decisions
Data Breach via Insider Threat
Mitigate
Transfer
Accept
Avoid
TOP REMEDIATIONS BY ALE REDUCTION
Implement endpoint DLP controls
In Progress
$820K
ALE reduction
Enforce MFA across all admin accounts
Approved
$640K
ALE reduction
Deploy SIEM correlation rules
Pending
$410K
ALE reduction
Restrict third-party API access scope
In Progress
$290K
ALE reduction
RISK-041 synced to Jira
SEC-2847 • Assigned
Risk Agent
I’ve completed the reassessment for Data Breach via Insider. The High rating (ALE: $2.1M) reflects the new MFA controls. Loss magnitude dropped 30% after DLP deployment.
CHANGE DETECTED
ALE: $3.0M → $2.1M (↓30%)
Loss Magnitude: $8.1M → $5.7M
UPDATES
We have strengthened our preventive controls for insider threats
We have improved detection capability across contractor endpoints
Describe a control improvement or new intel…
Audit Trail
v3.2
ALE recalculated: $3.0M → $2.1M
MFA + DLP controls applied
Today, 2:41 PM
v3.1
Controls updated by agent
2 preventive controls verified
Today, 2:38 PM
v3.0
Reassessment triggered
New threat intel ingested
Today, 11:20 AM
Risk Agent
I’ve completed the reassessment for Data Breach via Insider. The High rating (ALE: $2.1M) reflects the new MFA controls. Loss magnitude dropped 30% after DLP deployment.
CHANGE DETECTED
ALE: $3.0M → $2.1M (↓30%)
Loss Magnitude: $8.1M → $5.7M
UPDATES
We have strengthened our preventive controls for insider threats
We have improved detection capability across contractor endpoints
Describe a control improvement or new intel…
Audit Trail
v3.2
ALE recalculated: $3.0M → $2.1M
MFA + DLP controls applied
Today, 2:41 PM
v3.1
Controls updated by agent
2 preventive controls verified
Today, 2:38 PM
v3.0
Reassessment triggered
New threat intel ingested
Today, 11:20 AM
Continuous Monitoring
Stay ahead of changes across the risk portfolio
Continuously monitor signals across your environment, spot changes early, and generate reporting grounded in the latest view.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Frequently asked questions
How can AI automate internal risk assessments?
AI agents can execute the full assessment lifecycle: identifying risks from operational data, mapping existing controls, running quantitive or qualitative analysis, and producing findings cited to their source. Zania's agents do this end-to-end, so risk teams focus on decisions and strategy raher than manual data gathering and analysis.
How do you scale risk assessments across the enterprise?
Most teams can only deeply assess a fraction of their risk register due to the manual effort required per scenarion. AI-driven platforms like Zania break this constraint by executing assessments end-to-end, enabling teams to cover their full portfolio without scaling headcount.
What should enterpirses look for in risk quantification software?
The most important factors are methodology flexibility, integration with your operational data sources, defensibility of outputs for board and regulatory reporting, and the ability to simulate how control improvements impact your risk posture. Zania supports both FAIR-based quantitative analysis and qualitative scoring, with every finding cited to its source.
How do you keep risk assessments current instead of point-in-time?
Static assessments go stale as controls mature and environments change. Platforms like Zania reassess risks continuously as new data comes in from connected systems, maintaining a full audit trail of every change with before-and-after impact so your register always reflects your actual risk posture.
How is Zania differnt from traditional GRC platforms
Most GRC platforms help organize and track risk through registers, dashboards, and workflows. Zania's AI agents execute the assessment work itself: pulling operational data, producing evidence-cited findings, recommending treatments, and maintaining a continuous audit trail. Your team directs the strategy. The agents handle the execution.
Can Zania replace our existing risk register?
Yes. Zania includes a full risk register with scenario-level detail, severity tracking, trend indicators, treatment status, ownership, and due dates. If your team manages remediation through external tools, Zania integrates with those workflows directly.
How can AI automate internal risk assessments?
AI agents can execute the full assessment lifecycle: identifying risks from operational data, mapping existing controls, running quantitive or qualitative analysis, and producing findings cited to their source. Zania's agents do this end-to-end, so risk teams focus on decisions and strategy raher than manual data gathering and analysis.
How do you scale risk assessments across the enterprise?
Most teams can only deeply assess a fraction of their risk register due to the manual effort required per scenarion. AI-driven platforms like Zania break this constraint by executing assessments end-to-end, enabling teams to cover their full portfolio without scaling headcount.
What should enterpirses look for in risk quantification software?
The most important factors are methodology flexibility, integration with your operational data sources, defensibility of outputs for board and regulatory reporting, and the ability to simulate how control improvements impact your risk posture. Zania supports both FAIR-based quantitative analysis and qualitative scoring, with every finding cited to its source.
How do you keep risk assessments current instead of point-in-time?
Static assessments go stale as controls mature and environments change. Platforms like Zania reassess risks continuously as new data comes in from connected systems, maintaining a full audit trail of every change with before-and-after impact so your register always reflects your actual risk posture.
How is Zania differnt from traditional GRC platforms
Most GRC platforms help organize and track risk through registers, dashboards, and workflows. Zania's AI agents execute the assessment work itself: pulling operational data, producing evidence-cited findings, recommending treatments, and maintaining a continuous audit trail. Your team directs the strategy. The agents handle the execution.
Can Zania replace our existing risk register?
Yes. Zania includes a full risk register with scenario-level detail, severity tracking, trend indicators, treatment status, ownership, and due dates. If your team manages remediation through external tools, Zania integrates with those workflows directly.
