On-demand Webinar: Third-Party Risk in the Agentic Era
Watch Now
On-demand Webinar: Third-Party Risk in the Agentic Era
Watch Now
On-demand Webinar: Third-Party Risk in the Agentic Era
Watch Now
Third-Party Risk. Now Autonomous.
Zania’s AI agents execute the entire TPRM workflow tailored to your risk process - so your team can finally focus on risk decisions, not manual operations.
Zania’s AI agents execute the entire TPRM workflow tailored to your risk process - so your team can finally focus on risk decisions, not manual operations.
Zania’s AI agents execute the entire TPRM workflow tailored to your risk process - so your team can finally focus on risk decisions, not manual operations.
90% reduction in manual assessment effort
100% coverage across every vendor
80% lower cost per assessment
“Zania’s agents turned our risk assessments from a manual marathon into an automated sprint, slashing the effort to a fraction of what it was.”
Kenneth Moras
Head of Security at Plaid
Tier vendors based on inherent risk
Apply business context to automatically assign the appropriate tier and assessment workflow - go deep where it matters and move fast everywhere else.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Autonomous evidence collection, beyond questionnaires
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Vendor follow-ups, so your team can stop chasing
Agents generate real-time follow-ups and manage vendor back-and-forth so assessments keep moving without constant coordination.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Consistent assessments with full audit trail
Complete, traceable assessments with sourced findings, clear rationale, and full audit context for review or escalation.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Continuous monitoring, with automated reassessments
Track vendor posture over time and trigger reassessments when key changes occur—so your approvals stay current without manual check-ins.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Tier vendors based on inherent risk
Apply business context to automatically assign the appropriate tier and assessment workflow - go deep where it matters and move fast everywhere else.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Autonomous evidence collection, beyond questionnaires
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Vendor follow-ups, so your team can stop chasing
Agents generate real-time follow-ups and manage vendor back-and-forth so assessments keep moving without constant coordination.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Consistent assessments with full audit trail
Complete, traceable assessments with sourced findings, clear rationale, and full audit context for review or escalation.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
Continuous monitoring, with automated reassessments
Track vendor posture over time and trigger reassessments when key changes occur—so your approvals stay current without manual check-ins.
Zania collects evidence and validates them against trust centers, breaches, and public records to surface real risks.
“Zania’s AI agents eliminate the manual burden of vendor management, significantly cutting down the time spent reviewing evidence. This allows GRC professionals to focus on higher-value, strategic risk work."
Sakshi Porwal
Global CISO at Compunnel
What Changes When Zania Runs TPRM
What Changes When Zania Runs TPRM
Free up your team
Automate the operations from intake to reassessments so your team spends time on decisions
Stay ahead of risk
Go beyond questionnaires with deep research so you catch what vendors don’t surface.
Expand your capacity
Apply your risk standards consistently across every third party without adding headcount.
Your AI third-party risk team — built to execute.
See how Zania extends your team to run third-party risk operations at scale.
Frequently asked questions
Why do traditional third-party risk programs break down at scale?
Traditional TPRM programs rely heavily on manual coordination across questionnaires, evidence review, follow-ups, and reassessments. As third-party volume grows, this creates bottlenecks, inconsistent reviews, and long assessment cycles. Since risk changes between reviews, point-in-time assessments quickly become outdated, leading to higher overhead and gaps between documented compliance and actual risk.
How is Zania different from legacy TPRM platforms, risk rating tools, and AI-assisted products?
Legacy TPRM platforms primarily track workflows and documentation. Risk rating tools focus on external signals but lack context on how a vendor is actually used. AI-assisted products help analysts work faster but still rely on humans to execute most of the process. Zania’s agents run the full TPRM workflow using your risk methodology, from intake to reassessments, while humans focus on review and approval.
What parts of TPRM does Zania handle, and where do teams stay involved?
Zania handles the operational execution: scoping assessments, collecting and validating evidence, researching vendor risk, managing follow-ups, and triggering reassessments when risk changes. Your team stays involved where judgment matters. They review findings, handle exceptions, and make final risk decisions. Zania extends your team’s capacity; it doesn’t replace oversight.
How does Zania ensure assessment quality and accuracy?
Zania’s agents follow your defined standards consistently across every third-party. Evidence is validated against signals from disclosures, trust centers, breach history, financial filings, and other external sources. Every finding includes clear rationale and source references, allowing teams to review or escalate decisions with confidence. In practice, customers see high assessment accuracy at scale without reviewer fatigue or shortcuts, even as third-party volume grows.
How does Zania support auditability and regulator scrutiny?
Zania produces complete, traceable assessments rather than black-box scores. Each decision links back to evidence, sources, and reasoning, preserving full audit context. Teams can review historical assessments, understand why conclusions were reached, and demonstrate consistency during audits or regulatory reviews.
Can Zania adapt to our risk methodology and standards?
Yes. Zania is designed to operate within your existing risk framework, not replace it. You define risk tiers, assessment depth, review steps, and escalation rules. Zania’s agents apply those standards consistently across every third-party and reassessment. This allows teams to scale their program without compromising on rigor, alignment, or internal governance.
Why do traditional third-party risk programs break down at scale?
Traditional TPRM programs rely heavily on manual coordination across questionnaires, evidence review, follow-ups, and reassessments. As third-party volume grows, this creates bottlenecks, inconsistent reviews, and long assessment cycles. Since risk changes between reviews, point-in-time assessments quickly become outdated, leading to higher overhead and gaps between documented compliance and actual risk.
How is Zania different from legacy TPRM platforms, risk rating tools, and AI-assisted products?
Legacy TPRM platforms primarily track workflows and documentation. Risk rating tools focus on external signals but lack context on how a vendor is actually used. AI-assisted products help analysts work faster but still rely on humans to execute most of the process. Zania’s agents run the full TPRM workflow using your risk methodology, from intake to reassessments, while humans focus on review and approval.
What parts of TPRM does Zania handle, and where do teams stay involved?
Zania handles the operational execution: scoping assessments, collecting and validating evidence, researching vendor risk, managing follow-ups, and triggering reassessments when risk changes. Your team stays involved where judgment matters. They review findings, handle exceptions, and make final risk decisions. Zania extends your team’s capacity; it doesn’t replace oversight.
How does Zania ensure assessment quality and accuracy?
Zania’s agents follow your defined standards consistently across every third-party. Evidence is validated against signals from disclosures, trust centers, breach history, financial filings, and other external sources. Every finding includes clear rationale and source references, allowing teams to review or escalate decisions with confidence. In practice, customers see high assessment accuracy at scale without reviewer fatigue or shortcuts, even as third-party volume grows.
How does Zania support auditability and regulator scrutiny?
Zania produces complete, traceable assessments rather than black-box scores. Each decision links back to evidence, sources, and reasoning, preserving full audit context. Teams can review historical assessments, understand why conclusions were reached, and demonstrate consistency during audits or regulatory reviews.
Can Zania adapt to our risk methodology and standards?
Yes. Zania is designed to operate within your existing risk framework, not replace it. You define risk tiers, assessment depth, review steps, and escalation rules. Zania’s agents apply those standards consistently across every third-party and reassessment. This allows teams to scale their program without compromising on rigor, alignment, or internal governance.
